STR vs Long-Term Rental Calculator
Run both rental strategies on the same property and see which generates better returns for your market and situation.
Want a deeper STR analysis with AI-generated insights? Run a full STR ROI analysis →
Professional STR management
Related Calculators
Save this deal in DealCheck — Track, analyze, and compare properties in one place.
STR vs LTR Calculator — FAQ
Short-Term vs Long-Term Rental: A Data-Driven Comparison
When STR Generates More Income Than LTR
Short-term rentals outperform long-term rentals in income generation when three conditions align: strong tourism or corporate demand, a favorable regulatory environment, and effective management. In these conditions, a property earning $1,800 per month as a long-term rental might generate $3,200 to $4,500 per month in net STR income after expenses, representing a 78 to 150% increase in net cash flow from the same asset.
The gap is largest in high-demand leisure markets with limited hotel supply. Resort areas, national park gateways, and beach destinations see premium ADRs because visitors have limited accommodation options and are willing to pay significantly above the local residential rent rate to get the space and amenities a private vacation rental provides. A Gatlinburg, Tennessee cabin commanding a $300 nightly rate would need to rent for $4,500 per month as a long-term rental to generate comparable gross revenue, a figure rarely achievable in the local rental market.
The income advantage shrinks or disappears in highly regulated markets, markets with flat demand and intense STR competition, properties in dense urban neighborhoods where residential rents approach nightly hotel rates, and when management costs are fully accounted for. The STR vs. LTR comparison should always be net of all costs, not gross revenue. Gross STR revenue can be 2 to 3 times LTR income while net STR income is only 20 to 40% higher after expenses, making the management burden harder to justify.
The Hidden Costs That Narrow the STR Advantage
The most frequently overlooked costs in the STR vs. LTR comparison are management time and complexity, higher insurance premiums, accelerated wear and maintenance, utility and supply costs, and the carrying cost of vacancy between bookings. Long-term rentals have predictable, low-variable expenses: fixed mortgage, property taxes, insurance, and infrequent maintenance. Short-term rentals have high-variable expenses tied to guest volume and property condition.
Management time is a hidden cost that rarely appears in financial models. Self-managing a short-term rental requires 10 to 20 hours per month of guest communication, calendar management, cleaning oversight, listing optimization, and operational problem-solving. At a conservative $50 per hour value of time, that is $6,000 to $12,000 per year in implicit cost. Professional management eliminates this but adds 15 to 25% of gross revenue in fees, typically $6,000 to $12,000 per year on a moderate-revenue property.
Higher insurance premiums for short-term rentals typically add $1,200 to $3,000 per year above a standard landlord policy. Accelerated maintenance from high guest turnover commonly runs 1.5 to 2 times the 1% annual maintenance rule for owner-occupied homes. Utility and supply costs that long-term tenants pay themselves (electricity, gas, WiFi, toiletries) become landlord expenses in a short-term rental. When all these costs are accurately modeled, the net income advantage of STR over LTR is typically 40 to 80% in favorable markets, narrowing to 10 to 30% in average markets.
Market Conditions That Favor Each Strategy
Short-term rentals outperform in markets with high tourism or transient demand, above-average ADRs relative to local long-term rents, limited STR supply relative to demand, a permissive or clearly defined regulatory environment, and properties with amenities that command a premium (pools, hot tubs, distinctive architecture). The best STR markets combine all five of these factors, creating consistent demand and high income potential throughout the year.
Long-term rentals outperform in markets with strict STR regulations (particularly caps on non-owner-occupied permits), low or declining tourism demand, oversupply of STR inventory driving down occupancy and ADR, severe seasonal swings that require 5 to 7 months of positive cash flow to offset 5 to 7 months of near-zero occupancy, and urban markets where residential rents are high enough to compete with STR net income after costs.
Some investors hedge by choosing properties that work as either strategy. A well-located single-family home in a secondary market might produce 12% cash-on-cash as an STR and 7% as a long-term rental. If STR regulations tighten, the fallback position limits downside. Properties that only pencil as STRs and would produce negative cash flow as long-term rentals carry higher regulatory risk and should be underwritten with a clear understanding of that vulnerability.