Skip to content
View All Markets

STR vs Long-Term Rental Calculator

Run both rental strategies on the same property and see which generates better returns for your market and situation.

No signup required
Free to use
Not financial advice
🧮

Want a deeper STR analysis with AI-generated insights? Run a full STR ROI analysis →

Sponsored Tools

Professional STR management

GU

Guesty

All-in-one STR management platform: reservations, messaging, and reporting.

Book a Demo
HW

Hostaway

Channel manager and automation for professional Airbnb operators.

Get Started

Self-manage vs. professional comparison

Related Calculators

📐

STR ROI Calculator

Full return-on-investment analysis for STR properties

📐

Cap Rate Calculator

Calculate net operating income vs. property value

📐

Cash-on-Cash Return

Annual pre-tax cash flow vs. total cash invested

Save this deal in DealCheck Track, analyze, and compare properties in one place.

Try DealCheck →

STR vs LTR Calculator — FAQ

In most markets, short-term rentals generate 2–3× more gross revenue than comparable long-term rentals. However, STR also comes with higher operating costs — platform fees, cleaning, utilities, and more active management. After all expenses, STR typically outperforms LTR in desirable vacation markets. In less touristy areas, the premium may not cover the added complexity.
STR hidden costs include: platform fees (3–15%), professional cleaning after every stay, higher utility bills (you pay, not guests), furnishing and replacement costs, consumables (soap, toiletries, paper goods), higher insurance premiums, and higher management time or fees. LTR hidden costs include vacancy periods, tenant turnover costs, and potential property damage. Use this calculator to see the full picture.
LTR vacancy is binary — your property is either rented or not, and vacancy typically means zero income for 1–2 months between tenants. STR "vacancy" is gradual — lower occupancy across many nights. A STR property at 50% occupancy still earns income every other night, whereas an LTR property in transition earns nothing. STR occupancy also varies dramatically by season, which this calculator models.
The transition depends on local regulations, your lease agreements, and financing terms. You'll need to check STR permit requirements in your city (many require registration), furnish the property completely, set up on platforms like Airbnb or VRBO, and ensure your mortgage and HOA allow short-term rentals. In regulated markets, the transition can take 60–90 days to fully execute.
Markets that favor STR tend to have: strong tourism or outdoor recreation demand, seasonal visitors (beach towns, ski resorts, national park proximity), undersupply of hotel inventory, relatively STR-friendly regulations, and ADR high enough to justify operating costs. Markets like Gatlinburg TN, Destin FL, and Scottsdale AZ consistently show STR outperforming LTR by large margins.
STR carries meaningfully higher regulatory risk than LTR. Cities can ban or severely restrict short-term rentals with relatively short notice, eliminating your income stream. LTR is governed by landlord-tenant law which is generally more stable. If you're investing in an STR market, research the regulatory environment carefully — check permit availability, pending legislation, and HOA rules before purchase.
STR management fees typically run 15–30% of gross revenue, compared to 8–12% for LTR. However, professional STR management handles guest communication, cleaning coordination, dynamic pricing, and maintenance — tasks that can consume 10+ hours per week for a self-managed property. For investors who own multiple properties or don't live nearby, professional management often pays for itself in reduced stress and better occupancy.
STRs with average stays under 7 days may qualify for different tax treatment than LTR. STR landlords may be able to actively participate in depreciation deductions (especially with cost segregation), potentially offsetting W-2 income if they qualify as a Real Estate Professional. LTR income is generally treated as passive. However, STR income may also be subject to self-employment tax in some jurisdictions. Consult a CPA familiar with real estate.

Short-Term vs Long-Term Rental: A Data-Driven Comparison

When STR Generates More Income Than LTR

Short-term rentals outperform long-term rentals in income generation when three conditions align: strong tourism or corporate demand, a favorable regulatory environment, and effective management. In these conditions, a property earning $1,800 per month as a long-term rental might generate $3,200 to $4,500 per month in net STR income after expenses, representing a 78 to 150% increase in net cash flow from the same asset.

The gap is largest in high-demand leisure markets with limited hotel supply. Resort areas, national park gateways, and beach destinations see premium ADRs because visitors have limited accommodation options and are willing to pay significantly above the local residential rent rate to get the space and amenities a private vacation rental provides. A Gatlinburg, Tennessee cabin commanding a $300 nightly rate would need to rent for $4,500 per month as a long-term rental to generate comparable gross revenue, a figure rarely achievable in the local rental market.

The income advantage shrinks or disappears in highly regulated markets, markets with flat demand and intense STR competition, properties in dense urban neighborhoods where residential rents approach nightly hotel rates, and when management costs are fully accounted for. The STR vs. LTR comparison should always be net of all costs, not gross revenue. Gross STR revenue can be 2 to 3 times LTR income while net STR income is only 20 to 40% higher after expenses, making the management burden harder to justify.

Net STR Advantage = (STR NOI - LTR NOI) / LTR NOI × 100

The Hidden Costs That Narrow the STR Advantage

The most frequently overlooked costs in the STR vs. LTR comparison are management time and complexity, higher insurance premiums, accelerated wear and maintenance, utility and supply costs, and the carrying cost of vacancy between bookings. Long-term rentals have predictable, low-variable expenses: fixed mortgage, property taxes, insurance, and infrequent maintenance. Short-term rentals have high-variable expenses tied to guest volume and property condition.

Management time is a hidden cost that rarely appears in financial models. Self-managing a short-term rental requires 10 to 20 hours per month of guest communication, calendar management, cleaning oversight, listing optimization, and operational problem-solving. At a conservative $50 per hour value of time, that is $6,000 to $12,000 per year in implicit cost. Professional management eliminates this but adds 15 to 25% of gross revenue in fees, typically $6,000 to $12,000 per year on a moderate-revenue property.

Higher insurance premiums for short-term rentals typically add $1,200 to $3,000 per year above a standard landlord policy. Accelerated maintenance from high guest turnover commonly runs 1.5 to 2 times the 1% annual maintenance rule for owner-occupied homes. Utility and supply costs that long-term tenants pay themselves (electricity, gas, WiFi, toiletries) become landlord expenses in a short-term rental. When all these costs are accurately modeled, the net income advantage of STR over LTR is typically 40 to 80% in favorable markets, narrowing to 10 to 30% in average markets.

Market Conditions That Favor Each Strategy

Short-term rentals outperform in markets with high tourism or transient demand, above-average ADRs relative to local long-term rents, limited STR supply relative to demand, a permissive or clearly defined regulatory environment, and properties with amenities that command a premium (pools, hot tubs, distinctive architecture). The best STR markets combine all five of these factors, creating consistent demand and high income potential throughout the year.

Long-term rentals outperform in markets with strict STR regulations (particularly caps on non-owner-occupied permits), low or declining tourism demand, oversupply of STR inventory driving down occupancy and ADR, severe seasonal swings that require 5 to 7 months of positive cash flow to offset 5 to 7 months of near-zero occupancy, and urban markets where residential rents are high enough to compete with STR net income after costs.

Some investors hedge by choosing properties that work as either strategy. A well-located single-family home in a secondary market might produce 12% cash-on-cash as an STR and 7% as a long-term rental. If STR regulations tighten, the fallback position limits downside. Properties that only pencil as STRs and would produce negative cash flow as long-term rentals carry higher regulatory risk and should be underwritten with a clear understanding of that vulnerability.